Відео

as a painter, this feels like someone trynna tell me that modern art is beautiful.

This is a dandy presentation, inspirational and helpful. I'd love to learn your drawing hand and arm control techniques. Maybe some practice exercises to develop hand-eye coordination.

Frank Gehry has made a career of ripping Frank Stella 🤣🤣

Who will be paying the bills for all this future mess?

❤

❤

❤

18:54 Geometry & the flower of life

Yes, please! More of the geometry and the history of mathmatics, geometry, and numbers. Thank you.

Thank you! This was such a comprehensive list, I love that it was split into categories, that made it super helpful ✨

Thanks, I will check with my local architect if my arching is good, he should know

Bagus banget

❤

he's missing the "U"

The Larch....

And the Romans didnt use steel.. many buildings are still standing. You can think a bit about that next time you design a house. How long do you want it to stand before the steel doesnt do its job anylonger?

Love it, thank you

Gracias algoritmo

ංංංංංං

A beautiful intro into what’s coming. I just have one thing I would change. The experiment that proved the earth was a ball is not exclusive to the ball. The same experiment can be done on a flat surface with a more local light source. 😊

can you improve your visual thinking??

Those who watch this video must be rented, my soap is also rented😂

Can you do design process on Tadao Ando ?

Great video full of design concepts 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

The funny thing is that modernist architecture became less functional than traditional buildings. All the weird angles and shapes in modernist architecture arent very functional. So indeed traditional architecture is the most functional. Because it first designs a functional shape and on top of it just adds ornaments. But the core of traditional architecture still is just a very functional shape with some ornaments added on to it.

This is great!!

"In the olden days", is your intended audience 5 year-olds? I don't think I've seen a video with as many in-line ads and stock footage. Substitute an AI voice and you would have the perfect click bait video. Blah!

The more “starchitecty” the building, the more maintenance needed, the deeper the money pit. Bring back rationalism.

Great presentation thank you

A very thorough introduction of the matter. Very well done. Thank you!

acrylic is the best.

Wow. Love the quality as an independent film maker. Better than dull classes.

Very Informative...

Quality video as always! Thanks!

Thanks

Amazing video, very inspiring! Even though I mostly work with the computer myself (and I am not even an architect), I hope to try more techniques by hand in the future. This is a great overview to see different materials and techniques

The tip about mounting printer paper to foamboard was a revelation! What adhesive do you use to mount the paper to the foamboard?

At the moment, hand drawing is the cheapest and quickest option when talking to the client. Not even artificial intelligence can, for the time being, surpass it. To interpret what the client wants, you need a person behind the monitor with directions. Yes, I could give you more options, but the '' la prima idea'' is the basis and can only be achieved through sketches and notes. Then you would have to use some other medium to facilitate the process or for the client to understand it.

I think that people look at drawings for the skill, or the image, feeling of the artist. Images can take you somewhere. Music can take you somewhere.

We all have our dreams. 😊 I enjoy drawing and love this, your work. I sketch what I need built for my own understanding or to explain to a client or my wife, Hahaha 😊

Always nice when you upload! I'm not an architect (graphic designer with a penchant for architecture and urbanism in my free time) but I too appreciate sketchbooks (much less messy than loose paper). As far as media I like my waterproof ink in conjunction with gouache and watercolour pencils. Also Blender, as far as software goes.

How much generic stock footage in slow motion do you want? -Yes.

Proves we live in a Matrix.

interesting video, but it didn't really do what the title claimed.

Bruh I'm so cooked I didn't even understand the video 💀. Why I'm so bad at this

I appreciate that you are making these videos with the idea to help novice designers understand Wright's methods. This video provides a good introduction to Wright's basic kit of geometric tools. I have read extensively about Wright for decades and I have concluded that the geometry that Wright employed definitely has value for architectural designers. But the 19th century philosophy he attached to it is worthless rubbish. The two are not related except, perhaps, in the minds of Sullivan, and Wright. And they got it from earlier authors who lived at a time when people were heavily interested in spiritual matters while they were rejecting Christianity. So, keep in mind that the philosophy was a crutch for people who walked away from their church upbringing but were still in need of some spiritual framework to hang their worldview on. The biggest problem with studying books on Wright is that all the authors regurgitate the philosophical sounding gibberish that Wright spewed. It may have had some meaning to Wright, but it doesn't translate into any usable information for anyone else. And thinking about humanity's command over nature doesn't help you when you are struggling to come up with a plan, elevations, and sections, that are functional and beautiful. I'm not even sure that it meant anything to Wright either as far as design is concerned. It's very possible that he realized that Sullivan's gibberish was a good screen to keep his actual methods hidden from his competitors. It also had the benefit of dazzling potential, soft headed, clients with mystical sounding claptrap. The other time-wasting hurdle in studying Wright that stuffs every book on his work is his personal history. It always takes up far too much space and offers far too little help to designers. His personal life had a bearing on shifting his job opportunities, and that impacted what he was able to implement in his designs; but overall, being familiar with his sordid life is a burden rather than an aid to other designers. Wright was almost certainly a narcissist, and possibly a sociopath to some degree. "The Fellowship" is an extremely well researched and footnoted book that goes quite in depth on Wright's selfish and morally questionable life. Anyone who doesn't feel dirty from reading that book has character problems of their own. Nobody should look to Wright for moral guidance. Geometry is a tool that Wright used extensively and skillfully, but like all other architects, it is only one tool out of dozens that need to be employed. If you want to understand Wright's work, the best place to start is with his particular use of geometry.

I've stumbled across this video when researching level design for video games. Most games have levels which are made to fulfill a function and I was looking into ways to break this pattern while also keeping the game entertaining. I do feel a bit smarter now that I've viewed this video, thank you for making it :)

Careful, Terrence Howard is gonna claim copyright. 😂😂

Я не понял но очень интересно. Кто может коротко объясните что тут иллюстрируется.

Alchemical symbol to nullify the beast of the 13 revelation